Destroyer — Notorious Lightning and Other Works

In look­ing back on the Destroyer cat­a­log, I’m tempted to skip over Noto­ri­ous Light­ning and Other Works (2005). I’d be jus­ti­fied, since it’s an EP, and didn’t fea­ture any new songs. It revis­its six from Your Blues, this time with a full band (and not just any band, but Frog Eyes). It doesn’t read­ily exhibit progress. At best, it’s a lat­eral move, and, at worst, it’s a tiny step back. It’s kind of like Destroyer tried to smooth things over with rock n’ roll (and con­fused Destroyer fans) after the asser­tion that was Your Blues. Even inter­pret­ing it with the lat­ter under­stand­ing, hey, it’s just an EP, easy to for­give, and easy to forget.

Album Cover

Obvi­ously, I’m still writ­ing. Because, once again, I am inspired by other people’s crit­i­cism. I was read­ing the reviews of Noto­ri­ous Light­ning, and two stood out. The first is by Han­nah Frank, writ­ing for the Yale Her­ald, and who I cited in my pre­vi­ous post. Hers is a stream of con­scious­ness state­ment on Noto­ri­ous Light­ning (and, really the entire Destroyer canon–I think Ms. Frank and I could be good friends), and she has an inter­est­ing take…

These blus­tery six songs on this new record ren­der the cold, crisp math­e­mat­ics of Your Blues some­what more acces­si­ble; where Your Blues was immac­u­late, maybe hol­low, Noto­ri­ous Light­ning and Other Works is prone to flat­u­lence and booger-picking, the kind of organ­ism that dis­plays its organism-ness in all its farty and snotty glory, such that you can­not deny its vivac­ity, its obnox­ious­ness, its beauty.

The other review that stood out to me is from a web­site called BigYawn.net, and it’s not at all pos­i­tive. BigYawn.net offers a rat­ing of 1.2 out of 10, which seems higher than what the review would sug­gest. Here I was, won­der­ing whether Noto­ri­ous Light­ning war­ranted the same regard, value-wise, as the full-length albums. For the BigYawn.net writer, it’s a pow­er­ful enough record­ing to sug­gest that every­one involved quit their jobs in shame, and that lis­ten­ers con­tem­plate suicide.

The very strong, very oppo­site reac­tions from Han­nah Frank of the Yale Her­ald and jaron of BigYawn.net sug­gest to me that Noto­ri­ous Light­ning is more pow­er­ful than I’d sus­pected. My own reac­tion, though, can be found in my ear­lier suggestion–that this is an offer­ing made to smooth things over, a defen­sive tac­tic. And Destroy­ers ought never to be on the defensive.

The defense is strong, though. As I lis­ten to the EP, the beauty of the words and melodies is reem­pha­sized. “See, these are good songs, just lis­ten to them with drums and gui­tars!” But the other defense being made is of the choice to record Your Blues the way it was recorded. The orig­i­nal ver­sion of “Noto­ri­ous Light­ning,” I think, sounds so much more cor­rect than the ver­sion being offered here. Hear­ing these (in my opin­ion, very good) alter­nate ver­sions serves some­how to reveal the beauty of the originals.

Maybe, though, it’s not defen­sive at all. Maybe, to quote another favorite band, Centro-matic, this is an asser­tion of “songs above sound.” There is a sen­ti­ment of tran­scen­dence here, in that one song can sound great in very dif­fer­ent expres­sions. My favorite song from Noto­ri­ous Light­ning, “New Ways of Liv­ing” sounded so sweetly sad and reflec­tive on Your Blues, but here it sounds angry and ener­getic. Both ver­sions are beau­ti­ful, because the song, itself, is beautiful.

A song is not the instru­ment that plays it.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *